The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines this process called “dissemination” as “the process of communicating evaluation procedures or lessons learned to relevant audiences in a timely, unbiased, and consistent manner… Consider your internal stakeholders, such as the facility, unit or health care setting where the change process is situated, and your external stakeholders, like an individual or group outside the health care setting. Dissemination strategies include the definition of objectives, a clearly defined action planning (what has to be achieved, by whom, when, results, monitoring), iteration cycles to collect feedback from all stakeholders, systematic impact assessment and so on. A stakeholder is a group or person who has interests that may be affected by an initiative or has influence over it. This should create ‘pull’ for your research i.e. Feasibility ensures the dissemination process is practical. We combined text excerpts from each post‐survey and analysed the data using the codebook and comparable data analysis used in framework and strategy development. Methods of Dissemination Once the dissemination objective and the audience are identified, there are a variety of ways to share the developed content. We hope that these design principles will help to inform the future development of stakeholder engagement as a mechanism for promoting research impact. Invite and engage others … Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, Development of a measure to assess patient trust in medical researchers, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Socio‐ecological model as a framework for overcoming barriers and challenges in randomized control trials in minority and undeserved communities, Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement, https://www.pcori.org/about‐us/our‐programs/engagement, Receipt of Grant Funding (eg NIH, PCORI and CDC), Dissemination of Research Findings to Community After a Study or Plan to. Majority of participants were African American (52.0%), followed by White (40.2%) and others (7.8%). Our analysis of the complex and nuanced process of stakeholder engagement has resulted not in a list of indicators, but in a set of design principles. In the age of open research, don’t just broadcast. Table 3 describes participants’ willingness to take part in research pre‐ and post‐town halls of dissemination of research findings. On the day of the town hall meeting, participants viewed the PowerPoint presentation, video, and one‐pager. Our framework has components which overlap with existing frameworks for community engagement, CBPR, partnership development, and dissemination and implementation.16, 22 However, we define a framework that addresses an important gap to expand conceptualization of dissemination from academics to the community. When is knowledge ready for dissemination? D2.1 Dissemination & Stakeholder Engagement Strategy WP 2 Dissemination Revision 1.1; 01-07-2019 2/26 eHAction– Joint Action supporting the eHealth Network - www.ehaction.eu Dissemination level: PU = Public, for wide dissemination (public deliverables shall be … Dissemination of information refers to the distribution of information about the project's outcomes to a specific clinical practice or public health audience. Implementation process strategies were further categorized into 3 broad categories: engaging stakeholders ... All 14 dissemination process strategies discussed formative research to inform dissemination strategies. Specifically, we coded the articles and then linked the codes using a deductive‐inductive approach. Next, while this framework was developed based on one dissemination project, (a) we gauged the views of researchers who had engaged in community research dissemination and community members who would like to receive or have received study findings, and (b) our implementation process appeared to result in an increase in willingness to participate in clinical research and trust in medical research and researchers on the part of community members. Provide a dissemination process to ensure stakeholders are informed and committed to the plan. "Disseminating Projects Outcome To Key Stakeholders And Nursing Community" (2015, September 16) Retrieved December 2, 2020, from https://www.paperdue.com/essay/disseminating-projects-outcome-to-key-stakeholders-2155159, "Disseminating Projects Outcome To Key Stakeholders And Nursing Community" 16 September 2015. We finalized the strategies. A t test evaluated the bivariate association between trust in medical research and researchers pre‐ and post‐town hall. Department of Health Policy and Community Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA, Bridges for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Nashville, TN, USA, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute . Eligibility criteria included: (a) being over 18 and (b) had received or would like to receive research findings. dissemination (sharing the results) can help achieve the goals. Dissemination of research findings in translational research is nec - essary to facilitate uptake and adoption of interventions to im - prove health outcomes.1It involves the distribution of research findings to key stakeholders (e.g., providers, research participants, Measures include the following: Feedback and stakeholder discussions are important steps in the dissemination process that can improve both the chances and quality of utilization. First, we identified and combined similar concepts related to the return of findings to the community. We used the articles to identify key concepts of research dissemination. Funders (eg Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Institutes of Health and Agency for Healthcare Research Quality) now consistently request dissemination plans for the broader community and may request engagement of stakeholders in plan development to increase the use of findings.12-14 Recognizing an ethical obligation to provide findings to the community,14, 15 researchers—particularly those engaged in CBPR—are increasingly looking for effective ways to do this.14, 16, 17 Last, community members advocate for ‘community‐friendly’ approaches to research dissemination.18-20 While these strategies extend dissemination efforts to inform communities,14, 16, 20 there is a need for a standardized, community‐guided process for researchers across the translational research continuum to return research results to study participants and the community‐at‐large.6. Interviews were audio‐recorded. All participants agreed the framework was necessary and included main components for research dissemination. Translator. Working off-campus? To evaluate the proposed framework, we used a previously published18 study to provide the research findings to study participants and the community‐at‐large. These frameworks offer important concepts on dissemination, and some further demonstrate the importance of stakeholder engagement in this process. To ensure an effective process, we provide five standards to guide planning and implementation of the dissemination effort. Dissemination is often linked to implementation of research findings, where interventions aim to reduce or remove barriers and promote change – Hailey and colleagues highlight the challenges of matching research findings to the wider perspectives or requirements of groups being addressed (13). Dissemination strategies may vary at each level during framework application. This describes the intent of the programme to assist in evaluating the dissemination process. At community, organizational, and societal levels, commitment and political controversy may increase with each level.35 Changes are hardest at these levels, yet have the potential to produce the greatest results. Questions asked during evaluation planning also should consider the program’s conceptual framework or underpinnings. This is an interesting time for the business as it has decided to review its mission, vision and strategic direction. Studies evaluating dissemination strategies, involving patients and/or reaching patients, were included. Washington, DC 20036 . Researchers lack effective, evidence‐based processes for research dissemination beyond traditional academic methods to ‘end‐users’. Copyright 2020  . Involving consumers and other stakeholders in the dissemination planning process, as well as the guideline development phase will help you make sure that the format and language of any products is appropriate, useful and accessible (see the Consumer involvement and Engaging stakeholders modules). Over one‐third reported being Hispanic/Latino (38.6%), married (36.8%) and male (32.4%). After obtaining informed consent, participants completed a brief, demographic survey. Evaluation results were used to finalize the framework. The dissemination of research findings is a critical component of the knowledge translation (KT) process and is frequently thought to occur somewhere between the generation and synthesis of knowledge. Text excerpts demonstrated participants liked the culturally‐targeted strategies used. This ensures that dissemination efforts meet all stakeholders’ needs.36 Hence, dissemination strategies, implementation procedures, and evaluation methods and tools are effective to inform evidence‐based practices and policies for dissemination. It also describes the standards and indicators for each standard, along with competencies to uphold each standard. Executive Summary. Specifically, we merged the information into the phases, steps and processes of the framework on research dissemination. After appropriate partners are selected, the dissemination team is developed and steps are taken to ensure all team members are competent in the process. Example literature includes Harris et al (2012), Corbie‐Smith et al (2018), Brownson et al (2018), Tabak et al (2012) and Bodison et al (2015). PCORI uses a variety of forums and public comment periods to obtain public input to enhance its work. We developed a framework and strategies to guide community‐academic partnerships in community‐targeted, dissemination efforts. There was an even distribution among race [Caucasian (n = 3); African American (n = 3); and Hispanic (n = 3)]; however, the majority (67%) were female. Strategy to Disseminate Project's Results To Key Stakeholders And Entire Nursing Community, Strategies of Disseminating Project Outcomes, Disseminating Evidence Strategies for Dissemination the Key, Baker 2000 The Measurement of Project Effectiveness an, Strategies Of Disseminating Project Outcomes, Disseminating Evidence Strategies For Dissemination The Key, Baker 2000 The Measurement Of Project Effectiveness An, Program Evaluation Home And Community Based. Once the warning information has been generated, it is transmitted to the District Agricultural Development Office (DADO), the District Civil Protection Committee (DCPC), and district meteorological offices. We conducted a systematic literature review applying a ‘purposive’ search and article selection to gather dissemination concepts.28 This is not the traditional approach of exhausting the literature on the topic.29 We conducted the review in PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO from September 2018 to May 2019 using key words ‘dissemination’, ‘implementation’, ‘conceptual framework’, ‘research results’, ‘engagement’, ‘evidence‐based’ and ‘partnership’. This process is called dissemination. However, we incorporated their feedback from the initial planning phase in framework development and while developing this paper. Communication and Dissemination Strategies to Facilitate the Use of Health and Health Care Evidence. This describes the process of gauging the best strategies for research dissemination. stakeholders (health authorities, NGOs, policy makers, and scientific community); - To promote the project’s outputs and results. Our goal was 20 participants per town hall. The roundtable event was divided into two sessions. We implemented seven town hall meetings throughout Nashville, Tennessee, to disseminate the research findings. The team can move fluidly across steps in each phase if necessary. Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Dissemination is a horizontal activity and concentrates on disseminating the results of VERITE project itself to a wide range of existing or potential stakeholders. Phase one is a preliminary planning phase with two steps, and phase two is the four‐step dissemination process. The agenda for town hall meetings was to describe the completed research study, show the targeted videos from the community and researcher, and provide next steps post‐dissemination. Dissemination of Findings: How to Share Results. We purposefully recruited two leaders from our community partners, two Latino community leaders, 12 community members and 10 researchers to evaluate the initial framework. Using a deductive approach, we used a constant comparison analysis to iteratively compare codes to determine which steps and its process in the research dissemination framework should be kept, removed, added or clarified. Special attention will also paid to the transfer of knowledge to Eastern European countries through, conference presentations in these countries. Specifically, they were asked questions on barriers to research dissemination, resources/changes needed to engage in research dissemination at their institution, and needs and expectations of community partners to engage in research dissemination. The process starts with the identification of the project users (Ventilation associated pneumonia patients), gathering data to be used in determining if the user received output, identification of process of transmission and ends, Cross-Sectional Study to Determine Factors in the Educational Advancement of the Licensed Practical Nurse to the Registered Nurse in the State of North Carolina Using a line‐by‐line coding technique, we coded the text with the a priori codes ‘keep’, ‘remove’, ‘add’ or ‘clarify’ as defined in the codebook. In this section, we present the method/mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed solution. The Romanian stakeholders should become aware of the TRAP project’s scope and agenda and how these are connected to their own needs and priorities. Learn about our remote access options, Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA. It is a central guideline document for the MONICA Consortium in communicating and disseminating MONICA to external stakeholders as well as for … The additional information collected will be reported elsewhere. Design studies in a way that emphasizes dissemination early in the research process through involvement of stakeholders. Stakeholders are invited and strongly encouraged to use deliverables to the best possible For both community and researcher participants, we identified all characteristics of dissemination and improved cultural appropriateness using peripheral, evidential and linguistic strategies (i.e., saturation).31 Participants who agreed to follow‐up were contacted for final comments, a qualitative verification procedure known as member checking.32. Common methods of dissemination include: Publishing program or policy briefs; Publishing project findings in national journals and statewide publications; Presenting at national conferences and meetings of professional associations; … The dissemination activities will be implemented at local, national and European level The purpose of this procedure is to ensure a clearly defined and effective process of disseminating and promoting all existing policies and procedures to all EIT staff and students and other stakeholders, so that they can understand and apply them as well as providing channels to provide feedback on improvements and enhancements. The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess what dissemination strategies are feasible to inform and educate patients about recommendations (also known as guidelines). Stakeholders need specific knowledge about aspects or components of the treatment/innovation are needed in order for acceptability to be assessed. In conjunction with the developmental evaluation, implementing a new dissemination process with each PHC audit tool dataset provides the team with multiple opportunities to reflect and respond to stakeholder feedback, drawing on evidence and available resources to make and test refinements to processes, reports, and supporting materials. A primary goal of the dissemination process is to ensure that users receive the maximum benefit from the Census of Population product and service line. Stakeholder participation is an increasingly accepted component of natural resources and environmental planning processes in the United States and some parts of the world. Table 5 describes the phases and the steps and competencies associated with each step. This involves activities at project as well as at partner level. From 2017 to 2019, a community‐academic partnership was formed in Nashville, Tennessee, and iteratively developed a framework and strategies for research dissemination using cognitive interviews. We recruited using word of mouth, CBOs and flyers. (2013). Adoption, implementation and maintenance are steps taken by disseminating organizations for a successful outcome of change in organizational practice and personal behaviours that lead to increased productivity and improved health. identification, analysis and interaction process. In order to disseminate research findings to past study participants and their communities, we iteratively develop three, culturally‐targeted strategies: a one‐pager, videos , and town hall meetings. This Checklist is abstracted from the K2A guidance and is intended to serve as an example of a tool that can assist PRCs in dissemination planning. It is important to define the target audience and what they require in terms of process and content. Studies indicate interpersonal relationships can influence an individuals’ attitude and/or behaviour.35 Therefore, informal groups may influence one's views and participation towards research and/or health behaviours once they engage in research dissemination. Using those concepts, we created processes for the steps within the dissemination process. Based on the data, we made changes to each strategy (see Table 2). An ongoing process of review, response, evaluation and, when appropriate, innovation is the most effective way to ensure that clients receive the best possible services and programs, because it identifies what works and should be retained as well as what doesn't work and should be modified or deleted. RECODE. Three feasible, culturally adapted strategies were developed as exemplars to disseminate research findings. We developed three five‐minute videos to disseminate results, in English, Spanish,and American Sign Language. … Asian-Americans With Diabetes: Assessing the Intervention The dissemination activities will be implemented at local, national and European level Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful change proposal project implementation. The Communication notes series provides a number of approaches to planning and doing knowledge dissemination and exchange. Encourage participation. This means the community (ie patients, members) is engaged in entire process. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Creating an effective poster presentation. The relevant questions during evaluation planning and implementation involve determining the feasibility of the evaluation, identifying stakeholders, and specifying short- and long-term goals. 3. Table 1 provides characteristics of community members, CBO leaders and researchers. Once the evaluation is completed, it is important to share the results and/or evaluation procedures with a variety of stakeholders. Email: rfp@pcori.org . Bivariate analyses determined its effect on community members’ trust and willingness to participate in research using pre‐ and post‐surveys. This work was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Meharry Medical College and Vanderbilt University. One‐Pager. The CERD framework guides researchers and community partners to engage in a collaborative process and builds their capacity to conduct research dissemination. Research Review. Dissemination Planning. The final Community‐Engaged Research Dissemination (CERD) framework is a two‐phase process for disseminating research in the community where phase one involves planning for dissemination effort and phase two involves conducting the dissemination process (see Figure 1). The innovation must be readily usable and credible. After being transcribed, members of our partnership (i.e., two researchers) coded the data line by line. As a result, it does not address communication in any detail, while recognizing that “parties external to the project management team … Dissemination is a planned process of providing information on the results of programmes and initiatives to key actors. Once the warning information has been generated, it is transmitted to the District Agricultural Development Office (DADO), the District Civil Protection Committee (DCPC), and district meteorological offices.